For me the last week or two have been kind of depressing. Some of that makes total sense given the string of tragedies around the world, the political situation here, but I think if I looked back on last summer, I'd see the same thing for mid-July.
There is the build up to the Solstice with summer lying ahead, days longer and longer; then summer is here, and instead of each day lengthening, they are slightly shortening. Not to say I don't enjoy the things that go with these hot, sultry days, but they are never quite as good as I had hoped they'd be. How could they be when anticipation and imagination almost always trump reality.
I bought Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J.K. Rowling Saturday morning but decided to not start it until Monday morning. Sunday night, right before bedtime, I realized the cats in the living room had a new interest-- a beautiful, big, fast flying, get-caught-in-your-hair bat. The cats banged into things as they tried to catch mouse on wing, and as I congratulated myself on having their rabies shots up to date. They weren't actually trying too hard given a bat is something they don't see often since they spend their nights inside.
I wanted to get that bat outside hopefully still unhurt which meant opening outside doors. While the youngest cat raced out into the darkness to escape the mayhem, I locked the older two into a bedroom (where I might add they were relieved to be). Then the chase began in earnest as the bat flew desperately through the rooms, I kept trying to protect my hair (yes, I know them getting entangled in a woman's long hair is an old wives' tale, but I am an old wife), and my husband carried a big towel hopefully to scoop it up. All of this was not easy as bats depend on bat radar and don't actually see. What in their radar says-- open door to outside?
We lost sight of it for a bit, then looking at the rafter in the solarium, there it was-- doing its bat thing hanging upside down. Possibly it was taking a breather as well as hoping to remain unnoticed. We closed that area off to the house and opened its outside door. Bats cannot sense outside air evidently. The towel (wielded by my husband with less hair to worry about) swished through the air and eventually, the bat left. Then we only had to get back in the escaped cat.
In the middle of that same night I was awakened by the scream of an owl. Three screams to be exact from probably a screech or barn owl as it swept past the house. No, it didn't call my name but an owl's angry scream is an eerie thing whatever name it calls. Owls are creatures of the wild as well as have some mystical connotations-- as do bats.
Good start to a week where I planned to become immersed in Harry Potter's mystical world. I had enjoyed the series, got started with them after the first four had already become very popular because my adult daughter, who is a voracious reader, was a fan and loaned me #1 through #4. To be honest I would not have made it through #2 except for knowing she valued them so highly. I kept going until I too became mesmerized by the magical world and the questions of what would come next.
From then on whenever a book would come out, I didn't wait to borrow them-- especially given she usually reads them at least twice. Some were harder than others for me to keep reading. With #5, I put it down at around page 100 because I was so fed up with dark moods and teen-age angst. Everybody, who was a fan, said it got better and so finally after a few months, I picked it back up and they were right.
By the time #7 was due, I was as hooked as anybody as I eagerly awaited its arrival. Well not quite anybody as I didn't wait in lines, didn't pre-order it, no Potter parties, and did look for the best price-- ala Costco. I put off starting it until Monday because I remembered with the last one that they are the kind of book you don't want to put down. I read Deathly Hallows in two days (unlike some fans, I did sleep) and overall enjoyed it.
Rowling has some masterful aspects to her writing. Her prose is plain. There are no artistic paragraphs marked by me for rereading. Her writing carries along the action while dropping clues she almost always picks up later to reveal why they mattered. They are not books to skim. She has indeed created a mysterious, complex, and fantastic world. So what is not to like?
Spoiler to follow; so for those not yet having read Deathly Hallows, planning to do so, who don't want to know anything about the ending, stop here.
tra la la la
dum de dum de dum
Also don't read comments as someone who had read the book and had a different take on the ending, might give away something more.
Spoiler coming...
My biggest frustration with the ending involved Professor Severus Snape (portrayed wonderfully by Alan Rickman in the films). Snape was (other than Ron) my favorite character. Although Rowling has admitted in interviews that she didn't like him and is amazed anybody else did, in Deathly Hallows, he is finally revealed to have been Harry's savior time after time (which I had gathered from her many clues would be true).
Despite Rowling's dislike of him, her feeling he didn't deserve others to like him due to his nasty personality, she wrote about him in a way that didn't put forth her spoken vision. From my own experience in writing fiction, I have seen that happen. Characters kind of tend to take over and no matter what the author intends, that character will have their way. From her interviews, it sounds like that is what Snape did.
To me, Snape was the real hero, the character who nobody, except Dumbledore, liked or trusted, one who had loved and lost, a wizard who sacrificed everything on a lifelong mission, the one who became hard and yes, sometimes mean due to having been abused, and so often on the outside. Still time after time, he did the right thing without expecting glory for it. I was frustrated that he didn't get even one tiny moment of triumph. At a critical moment, through his murder, he was thrust out of the action by Rowling-- as she had allowed the other characters do throughout the book. I felt sad for him. Not that he was sacrificed, which perhaps was necessary, but it was how.
Snape was a complex character, one who the reader couldn't be totally certain of until the end. As one of those readers, I wanted a moment of fulfillment for him, a moment of someone caring about him. I wanted him to receive recognition, though as is true for the noblest of heroes, he never asked for it. He didn't, but I wanted an emotional resolution to Snape's sad story that I didn't get.
Maybe part of my dissatisfaction is that Harry never quite registered to me as the hero the author declared him to be. I felt he was a bit one-dimensional. Harry kept falsely assuming everyone who was murdered, in this long battle against evil, had been killed because of him (his ego problem) when in reality Voldemort was pure evil and obviously anyone who accepted his dictatorship was doomed to a brutal existence. According to the story, Harry was the possible salvation of the world, not the cause of the destruction which he often seemed to wallow in believing.
Harry did grow some, out of the teen-age brat stage, finally starting to trust, listen to others, not assume he knew it all, possibly on the road to having a realistic view of his own place in the world, and I was pleased whenever the author let someone else, like Ron, have their moment of saving the day.
I felt Harry's final triumph was somewhat forced and wasn't sure I bought it. It was almost anticlimactic after she had dispatched Snape so summarily and for no more purpose (in my view) than to give Harry his moment to totally be the victor. In the end, it was actually a false sense of ego that destroyed Voldemort and that's not a bad lesson for children (or anyone) to take away. I also had to remind myself, when something didn't suit me, this was a book intended for children, a world in which I was the outsider.
Despite those small objections, I did like the series. J. K. Rowling opened people to magic, created a complex and fascinating world which carried through from book to book. I will be interested in what she writes once she leaves these characters behind.
I still don't know how that bat got into the house...
15 comments:
I don't know about 'Harry', never having been a fan of fantasy - but I'm wondering about the little kitty - did you get him back in?? Those barn owls are sneaky little guys, they will mimic the sound of a cat to call cats out.
I have all the books but the last which I will buy on my next trip to Costco. I haven't yet read any of them but have been following the story through the movies. I will read them all eventually but have so many books to read that I hardly know which one to go to next. And then there are some non-fiction ones that I should be reading, too.
We got him in as soon as we got the bat out. Blackie is not really young, a very sleek, tough black cat who came to us as a stray two years ago. I wouldn't go to bed without having them all in, but it's more raccoons that would be dangerous here close to the house. He is woods smart, but I take no chances.
Yes, after all the batty stuff that was happening, and then the owl, did you get the little kitty back in? I've never had a bat in the house, I must admit--and how did it get in there? Owls hooting in the night always freak me out because of that book read so long ago, "I Heard the Owl Call My Name." Old Indian legend, I guess, but nonetheless, it puts me on edge.
I'm not a Harry Potter fan but was anxous to hear the ending--and got it twice from friends reading it--and then went to the spoiler on the Internet. I read one and two and then got bored and never went back.
I am no fan of Harry Potter Rain, but I love Hemingway's novels. :-)
I have read all of Hemingway's books as a young woman and read most of the biographies about his life and his women. He was a plain writer who told stories with complex characters and minimal words. He's not admired so much today but I still find him fascinating for how he lived his life as well. I also read Gellhorn, one of his wives who was similar to him as an adventurer.
Rowling's skill was to develop this fantasy world that was alongside the human (muggles) one (which many people today have suspected exists even without her writing) and to carry her story though 7 books (the last one is over 750 words). I felt with the sixth if an editor had been a little tougher with her, she'd have had a better story but there is something to be said for a book where you change from the world in which you live and become immersed into another world for that many pages. If I had not had a fan in my very literate kids, I might have not tried them myself as I don't generally read fantasy books. Although, as a writer, any writer who can make a billion dollars and inspire that many people, always makes me wonder how they do it.
Rowling was gifted at creating these complex characters, putting out clues books ahead of when they would have meaning and then remembering what they were. While I agree her writing was not as good as many others-- albeit writers who sold many less books-- there has to be something to what she has done given the numbers of people who have been drawn into this world. The books are better than the films as imagination always seems to surpass any opportunity to make it real.
We got the cat in right after we got the bat out.
I enjoy Harry Potter but I haven't bought the new book. I'm sure someone will tell me the ending but so far so good.
Argh!!!!!!!! I am totally scared of bats!
Oh COOL!!! I have never seen a bat, and would love to have some around the yard. They are great mosquito eaters. When ever I hear an owl I assume the neighbors cat was dinner!
I am not in to Fantasy, so I have not read the Harry Potter books. I am probably the only one who has not!
Rowling is no Hemingway !! J.R.R. Tolkien was as good or better than JKR .
Harry Potter is the last of the "sequel" movies for me to see. That also includes reading the books, no I idea why but have not ever picked one of them up. Glad you got the bat out and that the kitty is okay.
Rowling is who she is as a writer, Paul. She isn't like Hemingway because he wrote about the world he knew, experiences he had observed and many felt when he ran out of using his own life, he was through. He also wrote very simply without a lot of extra words.
She wrote about a fantasy world that she created. I wouldn't compare her to any other writer but I think her skills are to be admired. I am not generally a fan of fantasy or sci fi but I have enjoyed her books and the imagination that went into them
I remember having a bat fly around in our bunk house at the lake when I was a kid. Of course I was even more petrified when someone said they can get all tangled up in your hair if you're not careful....and me with very long hair at the time. A bat in the bunk house was a pretty common thing back then. EEEK, I still get nervous thinking of them flying around and swooping down at us.
Rain I think that Hemingway had "imagination" too. C'est finie.
As I've said, I see Hemingway as a gifted writer but his type of writing is totally different than Rowling. He might have even enjoyed her series for all we know but they were originally intended and still primarily are for children. They make no pretension of being literary masterpieces although that is up to time to decide. So many writers are popular, like say Danielle Steel, but that doesn't make them great. Time will tell how history judges these books. I simply will say I enjoyed the process of reading them all. You did not mention btw if you have read any of them? It takes some determination to get past a few of the bad places but it's only in reading them all that you can judge what you think about her 'quality' of writing. Now enjoying or not enjoying, that's a totally different concept.
When I write fiction, I write romance, have written 11 full sized, unsold manuscripts and romance has no respect from the intellectual elites. For me it's all in what someone enjoys reading or writing and I don't care if I am supposed to like something. I like what I like.
After the discussion on Hemingway, I tried to think if I have a favorite author and I don't. I have a few, like Tony Hillerman, that I have read all they have written, but for the most part, I simply read what I like and most of the time these days, my favorite books are non-fiction like the one I wrote about earlier-- Rogue River Journal. Otherwise although I have read many books, liked many authors, I don't have one that I could call favorite.
Whew...lots to comment on here. First off...I never knew bats had any mystical connotation attached to them. Tell us more! Because...last week, I found two small bats, dead, inside of a wastebasket kept on the outside deck of our rental home. (do you have any mystical explanation for this...finding 2 dead bats? Probably not good karma for me, huh?) Not sure how that happened! Maybe they crashed into the wall of the house and landed in the basket, up against the house. Also...that was my first time seeing a bat "up close and personal." They're furry! I never knew that!
Moving on to Harry...didn't read any of the books, but "felt" I did from my grandson and lots of interviews about it, etc.
Saw Rowlings last evening on Dateline...a one hr. interview. VERY interesting...It seems she said she didn't want to kill off Snape, but not knowing the characters I didn't pay a lot of attention. But it seems she won't be writing anything for awhile....she's taking a break, she said. And did you know about the Harry Potter theme park that will be opening in Orlando at Universal? UNreal...where these books have taken her!
Post a Comment