Comments, relating to the topic, are welcome, add a great deal to a blog, but must be in English, with no profanity, hate-filled insults, or links (unless pre-approved) To contact me with questions: rainnnn7@hotmail.com.




Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Theocracy

A prime example of a religious leader, who claims he interprets god's will and tells others how they should live, would be recently deceased Reverend Jerry Falwell. Moral Majority, which he founded in 1979, was a movement to take religion from the church into the political sphere (while keeping tax exempt status wherever possible).

Falwell's goal was to put Christian values (as interpreted by himself) onto the entire country by law. They call that a theocracy if it succeeds. Electing Christian politicians (as interpreted by himself) into office was more important than the skills of these officials. The motivation for believers to support this goal, which if successful would end separation of church and state, was a combination of righteous zeal and fear. If the right conditions were not met, well you know what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah.

Falwell, to the end of his life, taught fear of a wrathful god. Hurricanes, 9/11, you name the disaster, and he and his ilk were out there crying-- See! See! God smites innocent people for what others do; so you better smite the guilty ones before god gets you. That was not a quote but the gist of his fear driven message to gain power and control.

Although the Moral Majority faded out after about 10 years, its religious view of god has led us directly to the political situation we have in this country today. It never was about one man. This kind of fundamentalist movement, which sweeps through every so often, requires support and it still has it among one sector of the populace-- exactly how large that group is would be hard to determine.

Andrew Sullivan calls this particular group of Americans promoting a theocracy-- Christianists. They use the name of Christ but little else of Jesus's actual words. What particular Gospel relates to demanding lower taxes? Or what scripture says religious schools should be funded by government tax money? How about the verse where Jesus says don't help the poor unless they come to your church service? Or the one about how the poor are living in poverty because they are lazy? or where homosexuals should not be permitted to marry? Interesting how gays deserve AIDS but no mention that overweight people should have heart attacks in punishment for gluttony. And it goes on.

While it is true our country was founded by certain groups seeking religious freedom, a lot who left Europe did so because their brand of Christianity was not safe to practice there. Once they got here, many promptly set it up so that only their brand of Christianity was acceptable. Read up on the Puritans sometime and see how desirable a more or less theocratic system is-- even when it's your religion of choice.

At a certain point, a lot of the founding of this country was reinterpreted to suit current religious ideals-- for instance the idea that our government was founded on the Ten Commandments. Cecil B. DeMille did a lot to further that way of thinking to promote his movie of the same name by spreading those replicas of the stone tablets around the country-- those same tablets that recent battles have been fought about. Personally, I don't care if they are in parks or on government lawns, but this nation was not founded on those principles. It was founded on Masonic principles. Democracy is not part of the Bible. Yes, don't murder and steal are part of the Commandments; but those are principles that began before the Commandments were given to the Jewish people.

For early Puritans even bathing should be done with garments on. Exposing your body, even to yourself, was asking for temptation. Today there is a lot of the same thinking among certain Christianists, but entertainment showing someone being blown apart seems to be all right. This is probably how we end up with a crowd cheering when Republican presidential candidates endorsed torture (although not McCain who knows a thing or two about torture). My bet is most of the crowd that night would proudly identify themselves as Christians. Considering the words of the scripture, the fact that Jesus himself was tortured to death, that's quite a paradox, isn't it!

The United States is not the only nation where you can see how theocracy and a religious view of life impact those citizens living under it through the kind of leaders and laws that govern them. Many of us recently learned, when Richard Gere kissed a beautiful Bollywood star, that it is against the law in India for those of opposite sexes to kiss in public. Women in Muslim countries can be beaten or killed for not dressing according to the edicts of that area's current religious leaders. And the stories go on and on.

If you think a theocracy wouldn't matter to you personally, think again.


9 comments:

Ingineer66 said...

Excellent post Rain. Fanatics of any stripe are dangerous to a free society.

Anonymous said...

I thoroughly agree with ingineer66, but be ready for some backlash. The reason I started authorizing comments was because a Jerry Falwell nut attacked me at Sacred Ordinary--and I had never ever mentioned Falwell.

You amaze me with your logic and writing skills, Rain. How I wish I could write like you, but each of us have our style.

Anonymous said...

Great post, well done!

You did not mention the "founders", those who penned and endorsed the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution. I do not have the references handy at the moment, but they were by and large not affiliated with any religion or denomination. Some were openly avowed aetheists. How we got from there to where we are, stuck in the mud of Falwell's folly, is not a mystery, but certainly a tragedy. How can so many intelligent people be reduced to such a base, fundamental level by one silly, overweight, unthinking idiot like Falwell?

Sorry, I almost lost it on this one, but I'm back in control now...

Anonymous said...

Good post, Rain!
The parallels between our religious right and their religious right should make anyone stop to think.

Anonymous said...

Excellent post, Rain! You said it all and very well.
And in all of it, "fanatic" IS the operative word. There's a lot to be said for the old saying, "Everything in moderation." Religions could take a lesson in this.

Diane Widler Wenzel said...

Rain, "Theocracy" is absolutely well done. And I just can't add anything to it. I would like to attempt to expand the scope of the wave of corrosive Christianist Theocracy. Looking beyond our boarders to our foreign policy, I just became more acutely aware of some of my own grasing for logic. Why do I support the State of Israel when it is a theocracy? Perhaps I just feel ethnic Jews need a country to receive so all Jews all over the world would recieve their human rights and need to have a cultural hub to look towards. So I overlook Israel's laws that require immigrant men to become religious for one example of their theocracy existing in a predominently secular country. Why do I support the return of exile Tibetans to Tibet and the idea that Tibet is a sovern country? The exiles represent a theocracy. There isn't any going back in time even if the unlikely happens and China agrees to making Tibet a sovern country.

Sandy said...

I agree with Ingineer, fanatics are nothing but dangerous and there seem to be many in our world. I also agree with fran, your writing has always been wonderful, you keep getting better and better as you go.

Maya's Granny said...

Excellent post. Since my family lost one ancesstor in the Salem Witch Trials, we have always kept the idea of theocracy on the list of things to avoid at all costs.

Anonymous said...

They can keep their theocracy. Fanaticism of any kind is bad and dangerous. Some people who claim to be Christian are far removed fro being Christ like. Good post !