Comments, relating to the topic, are welcome, add a great deal to a blog, but must be in English, with no profanity, hate-filled insults, or links (unless pre-approved).




Saturday, October 06, 2018

reality versus how we might wish it was

by Rain Trueax

For this blog, I tend to write articles ahead of time, as ideas come to me. I had one planned for today and changed it after my friend, Diane, wrote her piece about her own experiences with sexual abuse. I felt her bravery, and yes, it takes bravery to share such things, meant I needed to change my own plans to address some thoughts on what has been traumatic for our whole country.

Here is not where I want to write about the recent hearings, guilt or innocence of anyone involved in them, but rather the subject of sexual abuse, ramifications on a life, my own experiences, and how thinking about the subject and its impact on adults led to one of my books.

My mother told me that when I was a very little girl, there was an old man hanging around our farm. She felt he was too interested in me. She kept a close eye on him anytime he was there. Maybe he just liked little girls, but she had a personal experience as a small child when two of her sisters were molested by their grandmother's boyfriend. She knew reality wasn't always as we wish.

This next involves fear. As a first grader, I had a mile and a half walk home from school on a gravel road, mostly with no homes. I remember seeing the car approaching and I didn't know who it was. I began to run and then found it was my father who had come to pick me up. My grandmother was riding shotgun and was angry at my parents, believing I had been scared unnecessarily.

Some years later, when I was maybe 12 or 13, I was walking by myself in a nearby city when a black, paneled van stopped and a man leaned out the window. He offered me $5 if I'd help him find an address. I shook my head, avoided his vehicle and hurried to my grandmother's home. If I'd helped him, what do you think I'd have experienced?

Here's the thing with sexual abuse-- it should not be that way. Girls should be able to walk alone, have fun, and not have to worry about being abused. It should be, but it's not reality and never has been. Maybe it will be someday but right now, it seems things are a long way from my believing that.

Dating is another of those situations with lots of possibility to go wrong. As a teen, after a date, I had a boy pull into a lakeside parking lot and turn off the engine. I liked the boy but didn't like the feel of that situation. I said I didn't want to do that. Then I added-- you wouldn't want me to, would you? He gave a very insincere no, but he never asked me out again.

Here's the thing-- do we set a scene for what happens or is it purely bad luck when a date turns bad?  Not totally either way, as one of my daughter's friends had a guy, who had been a close friend, suddenly turn on her. The rape led her to the hospital. She never pressed charges-- maybe blamed herself. Women tend to do that.

In terms of dating, my father also had warned me-- don't let anything get started because a boy may not be able to stop (or want to). I warned our son when he got close to that age-- if a girl says no, stop right then. Maybe don't date her again if she's been a tease, but whenever she says no, that is it.

Could he still be accused of more by an angry ex? Yep. Despite what some claim now, some women do lie about such. It's maddening because it makes the majority who have claimed molestation more easily doubted, but let's get real about human nature. Women are also capable of lying when it suits their purposes. Hopefully, the potential for that shows up in a personality before it gets to that point. Lies about such have found their way into the workplace-- again for other reasons. But in the end, we can only do right regarding our own actions, which means when she says no, that's the end.

There is a similar warning regarding women-- don't say no as though you don't mean it. That's what I have against some romances, especially as they used to be in the genre. The woman said no. He kept on and changed her mind, calling it seduction. Sorry, but that's sick. When she says no, he should quit right there. If she didn't mean it, it is her loss.

Would such thinking prevent all molestations or worse? Not remotely but it's what you need to do as a woman in the world as it is. Be alert. Be aware. Don't ignore instincts. In a drinking party, don't go off where there are bedrooms. In fact, don't go off by yourself with drunk guys. Don't drink punch in parties; and if you have a drink, keep it with you.

I know some women resent what I just said. Fine--  resent away, but it's reality of being a woman and not just our world or today. Such caution will not prevent all bad things from happening. We've heard too many stories of women who did it all right but ran across the wrong man, a predator, and their options were over-- men like Ted Bundy.


Years back, I was interested in writing a book about the emotional aftermath of sexual abuse. I wanted it from the man's angle. I read books where men described their experiences as well as how it impacted their lives. I also had a lot of stories I'd been told by those who'd gone through it.

For my hero, I created a world that was falling apart. I kept from the reader the identity of who the predator had been until into the book. I put warnings in the blurb that it involved sexual abuse as many survivors don't want such in a romance.

I think most know that sexual abuse is about control. When someone has it taken away by someone they should have been able to trust, it has an emotional impact. Even suppressed memories don't mean it isn't impacting how they react to others.

In Moon Dust, the hero is a high school principal. He's successful, has a wife he loves, but he's shut off emotional vulnerability even with her. She has no clue what happened to him and is ready to end the marriage. 

From the books, I had learned that in some ways, it's harder on male molestation victims, because men are supposed to enjoy it. We have seen a ton of articles recently about the impact on those when priests took advantage of the trust that should have been safe. I think it's even worse when it's in the family. 

Moon Dust is a romance, but it's also about what can we do when we realize that what happened back then is still with us. Susan began to find the answers she needed in a conversation with her psychologist friend, Barrett, over hot chocolate.


            Barrett sipped her coffee thoughtfully. "Give me more."
            "Your brain is in overdrive," Susan charged, "Just exactly what are you thinking?"
            "I don't know. Just putting together what you've told me before about Dane. Go on, tell me more. Something is trying to work its way to the surface."
            Susan smiled wryly. "Is it that hard?"
            "Don't be cynical. Just talk."
            "Did you ever try to tell him any of this?"
            Barrett stared into her cup of coffee, drumming her fingers on the table. "How about a refill?" she asked after a moment.
            "What are you thinking?" Susan probed as she poured the coffee.
            "I don't know. What was Dane's childhood like?"
             Susan tried to think, to remember all Dane had told her, and there was nothing. "I don't think he's ever talked about it."
 "Nothing? Not about his relationship with his parents, mother's boyfriend, step-father, a birthday party, going to Disneyland, a special friend-- nothing?"
          "I don't think so. From what little he's said about his parents, I don't think childhood was a memory he wants to think about. Dane's father and Blythe were divorced when he was three. His father remarried and has another family back East. Dane never said so directly, but from the way he spoke about his father, I don't think the man ever contacted Dane after the divorce. I know he never sent support money. It must have seemed as though he divorced Dane as well as Blythe. Blythe remarried when Dane was about maybe twelve or thirteen. His step-father died when Dane was ready to go to college."
            "What's Dane's relationship with his mother now?"
            "Maybe a phone call once a year, but he rarely wants to see her, always balking at any suggestion that we invite her to spend holidays with my family. When we got married, she did not come to the wedding."
            Barrett seemed to consider for a long moment, her fingers against her lips before she asked, "Was Dane abused as a child?"

 It's available through Amazon and other book sites-- Moon Dust.

7 comments:

Diane Widler Wenzel said...

What I like about your novels is their moral core crafted into an entertaining read. Now I understand better how your experiences growing up is at the heart of your writing.
I would like to add here we women have intuition that should be headed. When I lived in Bellingham I facilitated a life drawing group when I received a phone call from Ted Bundy who had purchased a reproduction of a drawing of a clothed nordic beauty with long hair and bare feet. She was spinning wool yarn. The day before he called my model said she poses neud for our group but not for anyone else. She said not to give her information to anyone else.
I felt a chill right from the start when Ted introduced himself as a photographer who wanted to do a photo shoot of my model. I refused to give him her information but he was able to get it from the job placement office at Western Washington University. When he showed up at her home she was lucky her black belt room mate was there. The next evening he was caught persuing another co-ed. My model was elated that her instincts were good.

Tabor said...

Sexual abuse is a very difficult subject. We are biological animals after all and as much as many think they can pretend that we are not, it happens. I think the more we talk and expose and forgive, the better it will be.

Rain Trueax said...

I agree, it's a difficult subject. I felt much of the media went beyond reporting to looking for salacious details to sex up their stories. They printed or showed things they didn't know to be true. In some ways, media has disappointed me more than the political parties-- and that's saying a lot.

Joared said...

The recent hearings have done little to shine a very positive light on how much is understood about sexual behavior between people. I have some rather strong points of view on the matter but lest they be misconstrued as having political party implications I won’t discuss them here. ;-). Our culture has a long way to go in grappling in a meaningful way with these issues but at least there may be more open awareness. Where that leads is another matter. Interestingly to me is that many who behave in a manner their partner finds objectionable actually believe that what they are doing is okay — whether it’s their personal belief system, lack of respect for the other, a sense of superiority, or whatever. Some individuals exploit others in many ways including through sexual issues so we always need to be cautious when accusations against someone are made, but there are appropriate ways in which an accuser should be treated.

All genders seem to have too many members who have been victimized in some sexual way. Even the religious community who are long overdue for respecting basic human instincts to procreate and would be wise to elinate celiabacy requirements of their leaders. Youth are especially vulnerable. As a high school senior I sensed immediately the impropriety of the attention a younger girls father was focusing on me, when he offered me a ride, had his daughter get out of the car so I would have to sit in the middle next to him. I certainly did not convey to him I was flattered by this action as a red flag went up in my mind. There were other actions he initiated which I described in retrospect as grooming behaviors as he courted my parents favor and trust in the summer before I left for college. I had little contact with him, and was appalled when Mother told me he had been arrested for raping a new girl who had moved into the area near him. Relating that story now, so many years later, if he had never been arrested, but I had reason today to name and accuse him, would anyone give my facts credence?


Rain Trueax said...

It is hard when people wait and bring something up later. Especially if they have few details based on trauma.

What even more complicated the recent hearings is the four people she named at the party denied being there. Of course, K would deny if guilty and maybe his friend, who she claimed was with him and laughing. But how about the other two?

For us, it is also complicated by not knowing anything about her background at that age. There is a high school yearbook that was shared about K but the one that involved her was taken offline-- although some claimed to have seen it before and said the girls bragged of drinking and promiscuity.

Everybody though took sides on this based on partisanship. They all though treated her with respect. Even what Trump said at the rally was based on her testimony, not at her personally. i think it was interesting that she erased her social media account. Also that she wrote the letter at her FBI friend, the one her ex boyfriend claimed she had helped learn how to take a polygraph (which in sworn testimony she denied knowing anything about and said it scared her).

But in the end, she's respected, gotten awards, and is believed by the left. While the right fears saying anything that questions her story. Even if they don't believe it was K, they say they believe it happened and don't think she lied. I wonder if we will ever know.

There are some high school friends who are discussing K and how he behaved back then-- but totally as if different people.

I'd believe your story of the predatory father even without the later arrest for rape. That just didn't sound right, how he was behaving, and you were wise at that age to recognize it. Sad that such exists :(

Joared said...

I can’t share with you excusing this Prez’s handling of this matter. If he wanted truth he would not have handicapped the FBI’s final investigation. He is very adept at using his words, and the sometimes insulting manner of his delivery to send double messages having nothing to do with supposed facts. I am always surprised when this sort of language is excused and rationalized.

Rain Trueax said...

I don't think he handicapped the investigation except how the far left saw it. She had witnesses as did Ramirez. They were the only ones that needed to be interviewed to see if they'd been lying and had actually been there. To open it up to everybody out there, who might now create a memory based on partisanship, would not have dealt with her original accusation. She decided on the names. She also had points on there where others have refuted when she testified. I imagine you have seen those also. I don't know her and don't know him but this was more about partisan issues and how people saw them than what happened. Everything seems to be today.

What Trump said at the rally was that she didn't remember much except she only had one beer and she knew it was K. That happens to be what she said. Yes, he ridiculed her testimony. You know the left claims this was a job interview. This was about destroying a man's life and everything he claimed he was. If he lied, he deserves it but it's not the only possibility when it's two people with opposing claims-- and in her case no witnesses despite her naming who they were.

Yes, he's good at how he delivers. Obama was too. I guess if they get that far, they know how to reach their base. I don't listen to either of them when they are pontificating other than I saw the clip of what he said at the rally-- he is funny-- except for those who disdain him.

I've said multiple times that I don't know what K was like in high school. The claims from those who knew him then vary so much that it's impossible to decide-- unless someone already has an agenda, I think this was a difficult issue. Women who had been abused often took one side. Those who worried about their men being falsely accused took another way. Those who knew women who had lied also saw it differently. I mean seriously-- women always must be believed???

What specific language are you talking about? Actually, Trump's words were dealing with what she claimed-- she didn't remember. You apparently didn't like his comedic delivery. How'd you like it when Obama deftly used humor. He once ridiculed Trump at an event with it but bet the left saw it as fair game.