Imbolc

With so much going on in the United States, it might seem what I'd write about. I've learned the hard way that it's best not to write in the heat of a time. When more comes out, and it always does, it can turn everything upside down. Besides, two things can be true but what do they end up meaning? So, at least for now, I am sticking to truths closer to home and things that I think can lead to a positive way to live. Hence--

image from Stencil on the aspects of Imbolc

 

 

It's not today, but rather tomorrow. A Celtic seasonal time, when the ewes have their lambs. We, as sheep owners, often saw the first lambs at this time. For those of us who celebrate a Celtic Year, Imbolc, in the Northern Hemisphere, it is from February1st to the evening of the 2nd, and the true beginning of spring. (I know, much of the US might find that ironic at the snowy moment.)

Imbolc (you do not pronounce the b) means ewe's milk. Whether on a farm or not, this is the time of stirrings of new life, what might be called the quickening when life comes back from where it's been dormant. 

"It is the promise of renewal, of hidden potential, of earth awakening and life-force stirring. Here is hope. We welcome the growth of the returning light and witness Life's insatiable appetite for rebirth. It is a time to let go of the past and look to the future, clearing out the old, making both outer and inner space for new beginnings." from the Goddess and the Greenman

This is one of four festivals to mark the seasonal changes to the year. Imbolc being first, followed by Beltane, Lamas/Lughnasadh, and finally Samhain- each oriented to a part of the

harvest as is fitting for the agrarian culture from which these celebrations came.

Imbolc may also be the time to celebrate the pagan goddess Brigid (she has been woven into the Church as St. Bridget). She is the goddess of healing, poetry, of fire, of the sun, and of the hearth. Hence it's appropriate to celebrate this time with fires. Brigid brings fertility to the land. As a Triple goddess, at Imbolc, she appears in her maiden form. 

Appropriate symbols for this day are snowdrops, swan feathers, white and green candles, and if you have a hearth, of course, a fire in it. The colors are traditionally white, red, and black. Smells associated with the day are cleansing and healing-- frankincense, mugwort, and sandalwood make good incenses. I've also seen dragon's blood suggested-- where would you get that? lol

As for foods, bake bread or rolls with sesame or poppy seeds. Dried foods like raisins, apples, and sun-dried tomatoes symbolize the sun. Serving your meal on sun-covered dishes would make a good accent. 

As happens with a lot of pagan celebrations, the Catholic Church turned February 2nd into a holy day-- Candlemas. It has aspects in common with Imbolc and can be traced back to the 4th century in Greece when it was a purification holiday, celebrating the return of the light. Candles are used in its observance. 

Because of the importance of Imbolc in one of my paranormals, here is the link to it for a bit more on the celebration. https://www.amazon.com/Ever-Before-Mystic-Shadows-Book-ebook/dp/B08411KB1B/

 

Clutter

  

found this quilt photo for free on the internet

 

Most nights, I dream and often remember the dreams. My dreams are colorful and often of things I don't have in my daily life. They can range from family members, from many years gone by to sometimes people I don't know or recognize what the brain pulled together. The dream this week was like that from years ago and nobody I recognized, but it was fun and ended up giving me a message.

So, in the dream, I was about to clean up a son's bedroom while he was gone somewhere. The room was full of quilts of all sorts and colors. They were spread all over. I began folding them, putting one onto the bed but most into a closet, neatly stacked. A few were damaged and were discarded. When I was finished, the room looked great. The surprise, when the son got home (nobody I recognized from my real life). and I learned that he was thinking more clearly with the room restored to organized.

When I woke up, I thought how the dream applied to life for what clutter does to our brains. It's not just in our homes but in other areas of our lives. For instance, we can be so jammed up with what's going on elsewhere in the world, to ignore what's in our daily lives.

Clutter is a problem in taking photographs with too many images to lose the subject. Or how about with writing and too many subjects.

Basically, I took that the lesson was for me to de-clutter my life as much as I can. Not easy by the way. 

Another day another dime.

 Well,

we can't say another penny as the fed will stop making them. Does that make the many we already have worth more money someday? Probably not unless they have the right images.

My writing on what's happening globally is no better today than last week. The killing in Minneapolis has as much confusing info on it as before. So the victim has four wounds, one in the head from shot through windshield, but one hole through the windshield, not four. Others were in her chest and arm. Who shot those? There are also claims that he has internal injuries from being hit with her vehicle. What makes sense to each side might depend on where they came from in terms of partisan hacks-- either side.

Greenland seems wrong to attack but is it part of global change with new and old enemies changing constantly. Iran-- bad however you look at it. WWIII-- is it on the horizon? I hope not but so much is out of our control, but maybe not what will hurt us.

My own life had multiple problems this week from one of our beloved cats developing a limp that meant she hopped to avoid stepping on one leg. After a veterinary visit and multiple x-rays (plus reducing our bank account), there is no firm answer, but she is getting old. She came to us a stray 9 years ago. We have no idea how old she was.  She is though, much beloved for so many reasons, and we do what we can to keep her as long as possible along with the two others, with maybe a future decision to adopt to have four cats... (fingers crossed on that one).

Then, there is the farm where one of our beloved big old white oaks split off part of it to damage the home roof, destroy the chimney and send one of the broken branches down two feet. Now, that's scary. Insurance is starting to deal with it (maybe) that but doesn't make it less stressful.

Didn't they used to say another day another dollar? I don't think so anymore. 

difficult times

 For me, this is a bad time to write what I feel. I do not know all the facts of many recent happenings; but feeling, I do know that. However, might that change when more facts come out. That's the problem with writing in such a time. Besides, not knowing, I do not want to write what will doubtless upset others. Reading the newspapers does enough of that. I might write about it all someday, when more is known, but not today.

So, I dove into my archives for things I had written years ago, like in 2005. I still very much relate to this feeling for today as a way to get through difficult times. Some say, live in the moment. I also believe that, but my memories are always also part of me today.

Before that, is this quote by Mary Oliver, known by many but always worth remembering.

"“Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your wild and precious life."

 

-------

 

I have this yearning right now to be where the sky is big, the land open and not blemished by man's touch-- needful as that touch sometimes is. I'd like to smell the sage, feel the prairie wind in my hair. I'd like to forget for a moment that I am who I am and just be one with the earth. Be where the sky becomes as important or more so than the land beneath, where it speaks to you with gentle or fierce voices and you know somehow that whatever is troubling you is less important than you thought.

The closest I can get to that at the moment though is looking through my pictures, remembering the times in the Big Sky country and listening to the soundtrack to Legends of the Fall.

I am lucky the memories linger in my head. I sometimes think we only do things to have the memories become part of us, that the doing is not more important than the lingering effect on our souls. Some say live in the moment but the moment is part and parcel of all we have been and done. It's not just what we see in front of us but all that lingers within and that we can see when we close our eyes. The moment can likely never be as big as the memories we take away with us and can call back whenever we need to refresh our souls and be somewhere meaningful with someone we love.

So for just a moment I am not sitting at my keyboard but am instead at a trailhead in the Absaroka Mountains and I feel the edginess of knowing the unknown lies ahead. Might a grizzly be down the trail? A big elk? or just a view that will make me catch my breath?

A new year-- according to one calendar.

 Do you make resolutions for a calendar new year? I had some years, maybe from my 50s or thereabouts where I'd do goal statements.  I'd break them into spiritual, physical and emotional. After a few years of that I realized I wasn't changing any of it. Time to think but not write anything down.

 

Soon a new year

It is almost a new year, which seems amazing. I don't have much to say right now, but found a video I had filmed about ten years ago on writing and solitude or not. I hope I come up with something new with 2026. Let's hope for the best for this coming year, as '25 has known a lot of tragedy in the world. 

Not sure what this year was, but it was when still at the farm.

 

Aging has changed me from my 70s to my 80s so far as looks, more then for many years, but my ideas are still the same about writing and what it takes. The cat behind me, I lost a year or so later, and I still mourn her as she was that special cat for me.

  

Seasonal Joys?

 After a week-end of horror events, it takes some time for deep breaths to attempt to recenter for a season of spirituality and love.

When I looked about what to write, I remembered thatI have several books with Christmas in them, but this is where the season, including the Solstice is at its center. I wish I could make it free but the best I can do is 99¢. Rules 'dontcha' know.

Holiday novella

For me a Christmas movie or book has to have certain qualities. 

The novella, A Montana Christmas,  moves forward a few years ith  the ranch family in From Here to There. Rather than a romance as such, this is more a slice of life story. It has all the characters from FHtoT as well as some new ones. There is a bonus short story with A Montana Christmas-- Curly learns a lesson.

 
Snippet from A Montana Christmas:

~~~

When Helene heard the truck outside, she went to the door to open it for her smiling uncle and Curly as they stamped the snow from their boots.

“How’d it go?” she asked at the two, who were grinning as though they had been up to something.

“What part?” Curly asked winking at Rafe.

“The doctor part, of course.”

“Oh that,” her uncle said pouring himself a cup of coffee and ignoring her frown. “Doc let me go. Looks like I’ll live to be eighty after all—if I don’t ride with Curly driving again that is.”

“Dangnabit, I did not take the corner that fast,” Curly grouched as he took a big sip of the coffee with a satisfied smirk.

“What else were you up to in town then?” she asked not ignoring the original grins she had seen.

“Little shopping is all and don’t ask for what,” Uncle Amos said. “Tis the season and all that.”

“Speaking of seasons,” she said, “with Christmas just three weeks off, I was thinking we should make some plans.”

“More than the usual with Nancy, Emile and the boys?” her uncle asked.

“I was thinking yes… Phillip will be here, I hope. I’d like to have the dinner up at our house. How would that be?”

Amos shrugged. “Never no mind to me if it don’t matter to Emile and them.”

“I invited too?” Curly asked.

“Of course, and a girlfriend if you wish.”

Curly snorted as he leaned back against the counter, crossing one boot over the other. “Women are too danged much trouble. Not gonna mess with one again. I’m too old anyway.”

Now it was Helene’s turn to snort. “You are still a handsome man, Curly, and you know it. What happened with Sherri?”

Amos was the one to laugh that time. “She found out about Jan and that was pretty much it for both of them.”

“Good riddance to both. Women just wanta own a man.”

“Maybe you haven’t found the right one yet,” Helene suggested.

“He’s been married three times. Maybe he’s right to give it a rest.”

Obviously to divert that direction for the conversation, Curly asked, “What you going to cook, Helene, not that I’d be picky or anything.”

“Just traditional fare.”

“So long as that means turkey, dressing, cranberries, mashed potatoes and lots of gravy,” her uncle said with a grin. “I got no complaints. But what’s this planning business about. Throw a spread, open some presents, isn’t that about it? What’s to plan for?”

“There are the numbers. I’ll call Nancy to be sure they can come.” She glanced at Rafe who had said nothing. “You will come also, won’t you?”

“Where else would I go?” he said with a grimace as he shifted positions and manned up to another sip of the potent coffee.

“If no one minds, I’d like to include a few others. One or two that might have to sleep down here.”

Uncle Amos frowned. “My sister coming?”

“Heavens no.” She laughed. “Mother is in Palm Springs with her bridge buddies, and Dad is off with Sharron to wherever it is she convinced him to take her this year. No, not them. I’d like to ask Phillip’s mother, sisters and brother.”

Curly choked on a swallow of coffee. When he got his voice back, he asked, “Phil okay with that?” His look said he doubted it. 

 Available at Amazon: A Montana Christmas

 

Dreams and Crumbs

 

This work of paper art is currently at the farm. We bought it at an art fair in Jackson Hole Wyoming. As you can see, I was pleased to find it. Photo taken June 2008.

Some of how I think may come from growing up at the end of a gravel road, at that time on the edge of a wilderness. Lots of time alone for thinking and reading. It might also have led to my political beliefs, which since 2018 are unaffiliated, not uncommon in Oregon to not belong to any political party. I have views that relate to issues. They do not fit exclusively with either party in the United States of America. One party has some of my beliefs when another moves to others. Frustrating.

I see people who might seem honorable but too often, they seem to fall under one side or another, as that's how it's supposed to be given our system. When they deviate from the 'rules', they lose political and financial support. It's rather cultish with how they have to fit under the bubbles. Even many voters find bubbles most comforting.

Recently, I had a dream where a guy, black and handsome, was selected to be a detective, but the title wasn't the end of the criteria. It required 'crumbs' to define that that meant. I woke up thinking that it was true for religious and political titles. Crumbs in the dream meant how the tasks were filled in. It wasn't just a title but what did that title mean.

Crumbs? Well, dreams can do what they want, but I can see how that works in baking. It's the crumbs that fill out the cake. In life, it is the meaning of the tasks that fill out how they operate.

When people elect someone from one party or the other, they expect that party to do what they want. It's not about what we as a country need or want. It's what their party expects.

So, recently when someone went to a rally for a politician (very much of a party person based on his voting and what he said), he finished his speech, to their delight, "It will take time, but I believe we can take it back."  

What did that mean? Take it back from those who last elected it? I assume that's it and happens on each side. What about others? Never mind as it's all about one side winning it all?

What about the oath of office for a Senator?   

 "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

Never mind, as it's all about serving a party, for whatever issues it supports. Time and again, we see that play out or the politician is pushed out. I don't know how it got this way, but it sure appears it is. And a lot of voters like it. I do not, and I respect those few politicians who can vote what they feel is best-- no matter what their party thinks.

Do I think that no one should belong to a political party? Not really, but can they do that and still support other kinds of issues? Do they need to see opposing leaders as wrong, theirs always right, and ignore realities? Quit thinking as the party does it for them? 

What is going on?

 First of all, how'd it get to be December already? What a year.

Stencil.--  In Tucson, we have no snow at our elevation. It's in Arizona.

The issue that has been troubling me has been pushed through the media. How seriously should we take it? Well, I start here with my uneducated, non-military history where it comes to rules of law. 

When I first read about six senators, one with a proud military history warning soldiers that they did not have to obey illegal orders? There were no specifics given as to what orders-- just to let them know, as if they didn't already.

Did it relate to the attacks on narco-boats delivering drugs in the Caribbean? Well, these supposed fishing boats had high level motors. That didn't seem like fishermen to me.

Then is the number of Americans that have been dying from illegal drugs, many of them young and naive (600,000) over a few years-- more than our losses to wars.

As someone who does not know military rules, I turned to other heads, one a friend (whose name I will not give) who had posted this for military protocol. 

  

This is something everyone should read when considering this "unlawful orders" hubbub that's going on. We have been discussing the “unlawful orders” video in our home. A friend shared this assessment from Lt Gen (Ret) Mark Hertling. It does a good job of capsulizing our discussions and is a good read for our non-military friends.

 

“When 6 members of Congress released a short video on Tuesday (18 November) emphatically reminding military personnel that they must not obey illegal orders, the message ricocheted through the political world and the media like a rifle shot. Reactions split along predictable lines. Some saw the video as a necessary civic reminder in a volatile moment. Others attacked it as inappropriate political rhetoric directed at the armed forces. Still others lied about what was said, or mocked the message as condescending. As the controversy escalated, the lawmakers who appeared in the video began receiving death threats, while the president himself suggested—astonishingly—that their message constituted “sedition” and that they should be imprisoned or executed.”

 

“I want to address a fundamental point revealed by the video and the debate surrounding it: Most Americans do not understand what is in the oaths sworn by our service members. Confusion about that, combined with an understandable desire to keep the military a nonpartisan institution, fuels both the alarm that motivated the video’s creation and the backlash against the video. A clearer understanding on this subject will help reveal the aspects of our constitutional structure that protect the nation from unlawful uses of the military.”

 

“Here’s the truth, learned on the first day of service by every enlisted soldier, sailor, airman, Marine, guardian, and coast guardsman, and learned but sometimes not recognized by the young officers who first take the oath:

“There is not one military oath. There are two. And the differences between them explain exactly who is responsible for refusing illegal orders, why the system was designed that way, and what it means for this moment.”

 

“One reason the debate keeps going sideways is that the public keeps talking about “the military” as if it were a single, undifferentiated mass of people with identical obligations. It isn’t. The Constitution and Congress deliberately created two different oaths—one for enlisted personnel, and one for officers. That structure is not bureaucratic trivia; it is grounded on the bedrock American civil–military relations. Ignoring it leads to the misleading assumption that everyone in uniform bears equal responsibility when confronted with an unlawful command.”

 

“They don’t. And that distinction matters.”

 

“Enlisted members swear to support and defend the Constitution, and to “obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.” And the UCMJ makes crystal clear that the service member’s obligation is to obey “lawful” orders, and that no enlisted member is permitted to carry out an unlawful order. But the enlisted oath is also intentionally anchored in obedience of the chain of command. The accountability lies one level up.”

 

“Which brings us to the officer oath—shorter in words, heavier in weight. Officers swear to “support and defend” the Constitution; to “bear true faith and allegiance” to it; and to “well and faithfully discharge the duties” of their office. They also affirm that they “take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion.” What they do not swear to do is equally important: Officers make no promise to obey the president and the officers above them.”

 

“That omission is not an oversight. Officers give orders, evaluate legality, and act as the constitutional circuit breakers the Founders intended. They are expected—by law, by professional ethic, and by centuries of tradition—to exercise independent judgment when presented with a questionable directive. Officers are duty-bound to refuse an unlawful order. It is not optional. It is not situational. It is their job.”

 

“When the members of Congress in their video urge what seems to be the entire military not to follow illegal orders, they may unintentionally blur the very lines that keep the system functioning. Enlisted personnel obey lawful orders; officers ensure the orders that reach them are lawful. The real constitutional failsafe is not a general broadcast to every rank. It is the officer corps, obligated by oath to the Constitution alone.”

 

“This matters in a moment when Americans are hearing loud claims about using the military to solve political disputes, intervene in elections, or take actions beyond statutory authority. People are right to worry. But they should also understand the guardrails already in place. The military has been here before—they have already, at times in our history, faced unlawful pressure, political manipulation, or attempts to turn the armed forces into a tool of personal power.”

 

“Also worth remembering: No one in the American military swears allegiance to any individual. The oaths are not pledges of loyalty to a party, a personality, or a political movement. Loyalty is pledged to the Constitution—and officers further take that obligation “without mental reservation,” knowing full well it may someday require them to stand with courage between unlawful authority and the people they serve.”

 

“So while pundits and politicians continue fighting over the optics of the lawmakers’ video, the core reality remains: The safeguards are already built into the structure. The oaths already distribute responsibility. The law already forbids what some fear. And the officer corps already knows that they bear the constitutional duty to ensure that unlawful orders never reach the young men and women who follow them, and who, in effect, they also serve.”

“This is not a moment for panic. It is a moment for clarity.”

 

“If Americans understood the difference between the two oaths—one grounded in obedience, the other grounded in constitutional discernment—they would see that the republic’s defenses against unlawful orders are not theoretical. They exist. They function. They don’t depend on the whims of political actors on either side of the aisle, but on the integrity of those who swear to uphold them.”

 

Finally, here is a commentary on what was behind that video, that it had been well-orchestrated and expensive for these six senators to read their lines. Having one a well-respected military hero had to add to its finding democrats cheering it. I respect this university professor for his takes on what is going on. If such interests you, check it out. what was beyond the opinions they voiced. 

 

My final thought is how divided our country currently is. We don't even know to what degree since it's all media driven. 

 

holiday mood or not

 In the United States, this is a holiday week-end, which means different things to different folks. I have something I want to write about, but it's so un-holiday in mood that I am putting it off for next Saturday's blog. 

Enjoy this time, however you do and something different, not holiday,  will be next Saturday. It is important though. 

Meanwhile find something for which to be thankful. There is always something

 

 

Thanksgiving-- last Thursday of November in US

 

images from Stencil

Next Thursday in the United States is Thanksgiving, the fourth Thursday in November-- officially since Abraham Lincoln declared it so, though it had been celebrated earlier. It has some typical traditions, which are often ignored. 

The idea is a day of being thankful, eating a lot of food, and gathering with loved ones. Its traditional basis was supposed to be the first European arrivals being gifted with a feast by their Native American hosts (wanted or not). In the US, it's gotten to be a bit controversial with some feeling it should not be celebrated but rather embarrassed by the effect of the new migrants taking Native lands and killing to do it.

But the concept to me, of a day to think about the good in life, is positive, no matter its history. In my life it was a major celebration with extended family when I was young and then family and friends as I got my own home and began cooking it.

Today for Ranch Boss and me, it's a day of diminished results but good memories. We do not live close to family; so it's just us. We don't have the friends we had in Oregon, as when we decided to live longer in Arizona, was right when Covid hit. We hunkered down as did many. Now I have some physical limitations that play a role in just a few nearby friends, who are great but have their own families for such celebrations.

Some years, we'd fix a full turkey with the trimmings. This year we just bought a turkey breast with plans for some limited trimmings. Overeating when elderly does not feel good. The pumpkin pie will come from the grocery store's bakery and not made by me. I've done them though using a whole pumpkin to start. That's really good but not worth the work for just two people. No more fixing cranberries, the whole berry way, as neither of us care for it. We won't overeat (due to above reason) and will have leftovers. 

I got curious about how others celebrate a Thanksgiving or if they do. Turns out France does not, but here is a link to those who do, not on our date but one of their own.

Thanksgiving Around the World 

Universe Truths?

 

 When I woke up one morning last week, my dominant thought was about the universe. I lay, thinking of how this works for us as human beings on one planet in that universe. I guess that such wondering always has happened, as soon as we could think beyond how to capture food.

Basically, we think on several levels. The first is likely most primal-- bodily. How are we physically doing? If it's not as we wish, what should we do about it. When that goes wrong, likely it's the whole of our wondering until it gets fixed-- if it does. This is not true for everyone, of course, like Stephen Hawking, who did a lot of thinking beyond himself despite a horrendous illness.

The next level is what I'd call close community. This means family, friends, those we care about. If that's good, we can go on.

Next is the broader community, our country. This is where our religious and political concerns come into play. Is it governing as we ourselves would like? Where it comes to religion, is it working for the good of that broader community? Somewhere in there humans figure out their take on the spirit side of life. If they find religious answers for behavior, forever, a god, that might end their explorations.

For many, it is then time to look at the world beyond our piece of it, other countries. Are they getting out of control, as once Germany did, what should we want done about that?

Only then, do we look to the broader universe, planets and stars beyond ours. Are those aliens visiting us; and if they are, is it for good or negative purposes?

There are a myriad of stars out there to wonder about. Do they have life on them? Does it matter if they are light years away? Do they visit us? Are there worm holes through which to travel past time constraints? This is all being studied by those with more tools than I have or even want.

The theory that the universe has a beginning (big bang) and an end is currently being questioned. Might it be infinite? We know one thing, based on human observations-- stars have ends as that can be observed. Hence what we call the sun, which has allowed for life here, will eventually end it based on too hot or maybe an explosion. 

What I lay awake considering is-- are there universes beyond ours? If there are, are they parallel to us, or we just a raindrop in a much larger world picture-- even though humans have thought of themselves as the center of it.

 

Mystery?

 

image from Stencil

Sometimes, I start thinking about a blog knowing exactly what I want for the topic, even if I didn't already see the details. I didn't this week. While there is much I could write about regarding our culture and what direction will best govern its future, I already said the immediate and now, I want to see more of how it plays out since voters in some states have spoken. Let's see the results before more about it.

What is on my mind is more personal. Given my age, 82, I am definitely nearer to death than younger folks-- or so we would expect. I have no reason to think mine is imminent, but then whoever knows.

The topic for today isn't though unique to being this age. I've thought about spirituality and death all of my life. In my mid-50s, I got curious about reincarnation. Reading a lot about it didn't answer my questions; so I spent a summer doing meditative regressions, where you follow instructions from a tape to take yourself back down steps to maybe your own past lives.

Being a writer, always thinking of stories, I had some concern for the stories I had gathered with that method. There were 6 or so of them, but none with being a queen or celebrity. All had sad endings. At the end of that summer, I worked with a hypnotherapist to get the same stories with one more. She asked a salient question when I brought up my concern. Did you cry when you come up with earlier stories for books. I know that some writers do, but I don't. But with the past live meditations, I did. 

For my personal exploring, that was more or less all I did-- leaving the answers of the beyond to mystery. Although, when I lost my beloved cat at too early an age, I did ask for a dream about reincarnation. I did have a very specific dream (not about the cat) that led to my paranormal/fantasy series.

Recently, on YouTube, I watched a podcast where the host was asking questions of a doctor, who does such research on near death experiences, which are death except the people come back. I found it of interest and wanted to share the link here with readers for others to think about.

All Souls Day Episode.

It turned out the host was wrong, not on All Souls Day, but at the time of year for such questions to arise with Samhain. This is a very spiritual time of the year for many religions.  A good time to consider what might be beyond what we see.

Government shutdown means what???

I wish I had good news for today, but it's not what's on my mind. None of this directly impacts my life, but pain for others hurts us all. What is below, I learned from reading/watching online, with two exceptions of those who shared their experiences.
 

Writing this now, when I have no idea how the government shutdown will end or if it will, I still feel strongly about some cultural issues that I feel Americans should consider. There are programs that will not be funded. How many of us understand what they are? Or how they impact the lives of others.

The first one on my mind is what the government now calls SNAP, which used to be food stamps, and when I was a girl, it handed out food from warehouses where people stood in line. I saw the lines but never was in one, but I thought they gave out basic food needs like bread, vegetables, cheese, and I don't know what else.

Today, Snap means Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Except now they are talking about children going hungry. Does not sound like supplemental nutrition, but rather what I thought Food Stamps used to mean, which could be total food costs.

Who should we blame for the government scaring families like this, which I consider cultural? I'd say both parties who care more about their political power than families.

Turns out one of my relatives works for checking food programs in at least one part of Washington to be sure it's legitimate, which sounds like all anyone can do and reassures me. 

But, I also was told by someone who gets SNAP that when they use it for food, and not all of it, the cashier gives them back cash. That means they could use that for forbidden items like cigarettes or alcohol. Nutritional Supplements? 

What does not reassure me, with its loss, is the SNAP programs are also helping to fund local food banks or even stores to help the less advantaged to get food. This is a big deal and makes me angry that fear is trying to be used with evidently 42 million people in the programs. If they are the elderly, disabled or those with children, that sounds right that they should receive it.

Is that all that get it places they might not be checking? And even, if so, why are so many suffering in our system? I know what some claim... tax more to the rich, but I don't know that it's so simple and political power might play more of a role than it should. Besides, what does it mean when people must depend on government, where it's so vague what the "government" actually does.

With the government shut down, evidently it will also impact airlines. That means controllers are not being funded by the ticket purchasers. This is about to majorly inconvenience those who need to fly. If it lasts until Thanksgiving, this will not only impact families but also the airlines.

The military will be funded by a billionaire's donations, which is not reassuring for a budget that already is massively in debt? What is going on and how many of us have any idea? I sure do not, and I fear that many do not want to know!

There are a lot of other programs that have been intended to figure out nature's needs, not to mention the park services. Where is the money going? I ask again.

We know the Congress made sure they get paid even when they refused to fund the country or figure out what needs funding. They don't seem even embarrassed in protecting themselves over others. It's very disappointing, but nothing more for me than children going hungry. Do the people we elect to Congress care about anything, but power for themselves-- that means both sides.

If the government cares about doing what is right for American citizens, which lately I tend to doubt, end the filibuster. It used to make sense when someone like Senator Morse could speak for hours to justify his position. They got lazy and now all it takes is one to say-- I filibuster to mean a simple majority is not enough. If Americans want one party or the other to be in power for that simple majority-- vote. But as it stands, it seems to me the filibuster just avoids responsibility. Get rid of the meaningless filibuster that enables them to avoid their duties. 

 

Rent-a-book.

 Because I know a lot of readers enjoy books they rent to read via KU, I decided to add my romantic, suspense contemporaries to that list. To do that I had to make sure they were not widely distributed, which takes a bit (some wide spots also allow renting them but Amazon's rules for KU is they just all be exclusive for independent writers, like myself.

I don't know how to advertise they are there; but if you use Kindle Unlimited, here are the titles. They rent for free but it does take a paid, monthly membership.

As usual, you can click on the link of the title to read its blurb and a free sample. 

~~~~~

Desert Inferno-- Landscape painter, Rachel O'Brian finds a dying man on her family's remote desert ranch and Border Patrol comes to investigate. Jake is an ugly man and no way is he looking to fall in love with a beautiful woman where it can never be. He doesn't know it's not just Rachel who is looking for an ending-- just of a different sort than Rachel has in mind. It all is settled on the desert where only the toughest survive.

A Beauty and the Beast story with a psychopathic villain to fuel the challenges to Happly Ever After.

Evening Star-- When Portland attorney, Marla Jamison, meets Randy O'Brian, she wants nothing to do with the younger, handsome cop. She has a spoiled cat-- what else does she need? What we need and want, aren't always the same thing. Marla falls in love, but Randy has secrets that endanger both their lives. She needs to find her inner warrior. ( wrong person, wrong time and Fate)

Bannister's Way-- David Bannister has been undercover before but when he takes a job in Oregon and reconnects with his artist wife, Raven, undercover takes on a new meaning. David was in Desert Inferno. Characters from Evening Star show up in this book, totally set in the Portland, Oregon area, with art, mystery, suspense, and a game playing killer riding along for the unexpected twists. 

(Think ..a difficult soul-mate story) 

Moon Dust-- For her emotional and physical health, Susan needs a divorce from her husband, Dane, a Portland high school principal. is facing more than heartbreak as tensions with a militia leader escalate. If Dane can't open up to his wife about his own secrets, an attack by a madman will not be the worst of what he faces. This story is about more than whether love can be healed, but also the impact of brainwashing, when people no longer realize that it was done to them.

(The wounded hero, and rebuilding a relationship)

Second Chance-- Psychologist Barrett juggles being a
single mother with an invasive ex. She cannot afford the complications a truck driver, animal rescuer, much younger man would bring to her daughter or her. This book follows up secondary characters in Moon Dust. Judd has done all he can to rebuild his life from early mistakes. He's long been in love with Barrett but it was an unrealistic dream-- or is it? Well, he better survive long enough to find out.

Hidden Pearl-- Architect, S.T. Taggert needs to find his sister, who it appears has joined a dangerous cult. S.T. does not want the complications of a beautiful photo-journalist, who has come to Oregon to do a series on younger men doing important work. As they both delve into the world of a fanatic, they are soon on the run for their lives with a need to stop someone from killing again.

Her Dark Angel-- Katy has come to Reno to help her uncle while his receptionist is out. Dill, because of a perilous situation, is

determined to make her visit a short one. Beauty better be prepared to fight for her beast if she wants a happily ever after. Reluctantly, Dill has been involved in working undercover for the government. He has made a dangerous enemy. His fear is it will end up hurting those he has come to love. The other thing he has worried about keeping safe is his adopted stray cat.

(A different Beauty and the Beast with an opposites attract take and a improbable marriage of convenance.)

~~~~~

These books are all full length novels of at least 80,000 words. They  were written in the 90s, updated and reedited recently. Some have strong, connecting characters like Moon Dust and Second Chance, but none related by family, more interests and caring. I brought them out in 2012 when they had sales, but none recently. That has led me to think maybe renting is the way to get readers, but where it comes to marketing, who knows. They are also listed in my website. I have other contemporaries but these fit together. Without knowing much about KU, this is an experiment. All the rest of my books are wide-- well, not the fantasy contemporaries, but not sure yet what to do with those. The joys of writing, when it reaches the marketing stage... Writers want others to find and read their books and therein lies the mystery.

You can find how to rent these books by clicking on the link, going to my website along here, hit the link, or with a search for their titles and Rain Trueax on Amazon. 

 

 

Defense of the romance genre

 

image from Canstock

So what do romance novels give to women like I was and those who read the romances today, the women I'd like to interest in reading mine? In the sociology studies I have seen, they are frequently read by women with high stress jobs, sound marriages, families, and a lot of pressure. The books aren't a substitute for reality but just provide a break from it.

If someone thought they are generally read by lonely spinsters at home waiting for their Prince Charming, the studies say they are not (leave that to social media-- wait don't.

Romances are mostly read by women and men with very active lives, most frequently satisfactorily married. They are very unlikely to have a hero/heroine like those in the books and they wouldn't want them. They are pretty satisfied with what they do have. They aren't plotting when they will run off for their dream. Like men's Tom Clancy novels, it's just a break to travel into someone else's life for a few hours where it's exciting.

For women, it's a bit like the Barbie dolls that some feminists had a fit little girls were being ruined for life if they played with them. It doesn't make those girls want to have a figure like Barbie. She just represents glamor, imagination and play. I think that's a lot of what the romance books represent-- a break from reality and not in a bad way.

The romances that I write are involved with history, other relationships, and the difficulty of two people combining their lives as my husband and I did 61 years ago. Like the romances that I write, we've had our ups and downs, but luckily still enjoy each other's company. Romances combine love with real life obstacles.  

who writes or reads romances?

 

One thing that many people don't know is that men also write romances. Some do it under their own name or a pseudonym, but others in different genres. Westerns often have a romance in their story, though it won't be at the core. Examples are Zane Grey and Louis L'Amour.  

The thing is relationships are at the heart of many books, whether key or alongside the action. Because reality is human interactions are what makes the world go round, not just babies but moving forward. My romances are all heterosexual but there are good romances out there which are not. It's all about thee strong connection. 

 Because so many are prejudiced against the idea of romance as a key part of a book, I know I always lose readers here who challenge that as realistic. Romance novels have a bad rap, probably about the equivalent of soap operas. Who reads them? Maybe women a lot like I was when I did.

My first romances (to read that is) came when I was in the end of grade school and began checking out from the library some of those sweet stories like Paintbox Summer by Betty Cavanna (I had forgotten the author's name but still remembered that title which led to the author).

Those books were pretty much like the little films of the time on the Mickey Mouse Club with Spin, Marty and Annette (if you aren't in your sixties at least, you probably have no idea who they were). The stories were sweet. Sex, drugs, and alcohol rarely intruded in the lives of those teens; or if they did, they were shown as negative. I was living a life a lot like those books; so they suited me for a few years.

Then in my early teens came the westerns which really were my first romance reads of an adult sort. I was as interested then in the western life as the romantic parts. The women in Zane Grey, Louis L'Amour, etc. stories were often learning to live a western life and toughen up. The men they were attracted to were as tough as the land.

From this came more grown up fare by authors like Frank Yerby and Ernest Hemingway (yes, he did write stories with romance even though it usually didn't end well). The romances I read during that period had history as more important than the romantic parts, and the endings might or might not have been happy.

It wasn't until I was married and I think had my first baby that I actually read my first romance novels of the bodice ripper sort, which had only recently come into popularity with authors like Rosemary Rogers, and I might add were considered wicked back then. For me, those books were quite enlightening, and I went for enlightenment in a big way for a while.

Then I realized I didn't think it was healthy when any rape was romanticized or glorified which means even by the hero. I still read romances but less frequently and a bit more carefully chosen; until, boom, I lost interest in all of them.

More on this next week as to a defense of the genre.