Saturday, November 28, 2009

Modern
culture offers some complexities that weren't faced in the past. These
questions of right and wrong aren't always answered by religion-- even
if we follow a religion. They can form ethical conundrums if we stop to
puzzle through them. Following are some examples of what I am thinking
about.
Today we have people with enough money to travel wherever
they wish, finding fascinating places to view, and then leaving
supposedly without a trace of themselves left behind-- except some
money. We also have people who live in those places, often very
primitively. Those people are often part of the appeal for what today is
referred to as adventure travelers.
So instead of taking a place
over and changing it, the goal is keeping it as it was to make it
interesting to see even if some live in poverty or worse to offer those
views.
This is one such example:
[Elephants or villagers].
To have something adventuring tourists will pay to see, the elephant
population is allowed to grow and sometimes rampage. Although the
country receives financial benefits from the tourists, the villagers
receive only death and destruction.
Complexities of modern life.
We do still have the problem of the old-fashioned taking over of a country and what does the rest of the world do about it?
Tibet: Cry of the Snow Lion
is about Tibet with China doing the old-fashioned occupying and
conquering after Mao became the ruler of China. They justified their
actions as liberating the Tibetan people who had asked for no such
liberation and often had to be killed to be forced to accept it along
with accepting the occupying army and Chinese settlers.
I knew
the story but always thought Tibet still existed even though the world
had been ignoring what happened there. Then we got our newest National
Geographic map where there is no Tibet. There is instead China and the
Tibetan Plateau-- in short a recognition that Tibet has been officially
swallowed.
Who would fight to protect the Tibetans? Certainly not
the United States who is in debt up to its neck and above. Although the
Dalai Lama said he understood and thinks Obama has other ways to move
forward on things, our president didn't meet with the exiled leader of
the Tibetan people when he came to Washington D.C recently which was a
first. That happened likely because Obama planned a trip to China to
whom we owe so much money that we cannot afford to offend their
leadership. Taiwan, watch out!
Is the taking over of another
country okay when it's one big enough doing it? The argument goes that
it's okay because China originally had Tibet as part of its domain.
Really? What else did China have besides that? We have seen the same
argument with North and South Korea as well as Vietnam. The countries
were once one-- pretty much everything was; so now it's okay to conquer
it?
Complexities of modern life.
On
a smaller scale, we were recently at Finley Wildlife Refuge. It is a
wonderful place set aside for birds and wildlife. It is a mostly safe
place for them to live and breed... But all around it are grass seed
fields where the geese love to graze. These are fields planted for
families to make a living but so many geese can decimate the grasses. As
a compromise there is hunting allowed sometimes to reduce the numbers
of certain of the geese and ducks.
So it's beautiful to watch
these swans, to listen to their calls to each other which were so
melodic as to be almost like songs, and a very contradictory emotion to
once in awhile hear the boom of nearby shotguns.
We had the
experience recently at the farm when we walked up our road, saw a lot of
geese in our pasture, grazing alongside the cattle; then watched them
fly off thinking how beautiful-- only to within moments hear the boom of
shotguns in the next valley about the time the birds would have flown
over.
Farm Boss reassured me that it was skeet shooting. Maybe or
maybe some of those beautiful birds were shot right after leaving the
safety of our pasture. And how long and how many of them could we
provide refuge in our pasture. The cattle and sheep also depend on that
grass. Provide refuge. Don't provide refuge?
Complexities of modern life.
Finally (well not really but one more of these examples of complexity) we watched on HBO the recent remake of
The Day the Earth Stood Still starring
Keanu Reeves as part of an alien population who have decided humans are
so abusing earth that they must be eliminated if the planet it to
survive with habitability.
There wasn't a lot of story, but lots
of special effects and one dominant question: Are humans worthy of
having such a wonderful planet upon which to live? We say we own it but
then argue over what that means, abuse it and each other, and can't
agree on what quality of living means for ourselves or the earth. It was
easy to make the alien's case for eliminating us as a species.
Of
course, the thing is there are those among us who are worthy (most of
us would start by naming our families, friends, and selves). In the film
that was the case the humans made. We can change. We can do what is
right. Give us another chance. But it was only at a point of disaster
that humans were willing to do that. Would it change anything even if
that happened?

How
do we resolve these questions that it seems money decides everything.
Want to visit a people at the price of elephants rampaging over them? No
problem if you can afford it. With the complex lives some humans have,
the appeal of viewing the simple life is very appealing-- so long as
it's just as a voyeur.
Is there another way to figure out what is
right to do? How about starting with the recognition that being able to
afford something does not make it the right choice. Another good one is
just because someone else says it's okay does not mean it is.
Photos from Finley Wildlife Refuge other than one from our pasture.
And don't bother telling me I think too much. I already know it.