One thing that many people don't know is that men also write romances. Some do it under their own name or a pseudonym, but others in different genres. Westerns often have a romance in their story, though it won't be at the core. Examples are Zane Grey and Louis L'Amour.
The thing is relationships are at the heart of many books, whether key or alongside the action. Because reality is human interactions are what makes the world go round, not just babies but moving forward. My romances are all heterosexual but there are good romances out there which are not. It's all about thee strong connection.
Because so many are prejudiced against the idea of romance as a key part of a book, I know I always lose readers here who challenge that as realistic. Romance novels have a bad rap, probably about the equivalent
of soap operas. Who reads them? Maybe women a lot like I was when I
did.
My first romances (to read that is) came when I was in the
end of grade school and began checking out from the library some of
those sweet stories like Paintbox Summer by Betty Cavanna (I had forgotten the author's name but still remembered that title which led to the author).
Those
books were pretty much like the little films of the time on the Mickey
Mouse Club with Spin, Marty and Annette (if you aren't in your sixties
at least, you probably have no idea who they were). The stories were
sweet. Sex, drugs, and alcohol rarely intruded in the lives of those
teens; or if they did, they were shown as negative. I was living a life a
lot like those books; so they suited me for a few years.
Then in
my early teens came the westerns which really were my first romance
reads of an adult sort. I was as interested then in the western life as
the romantic parts. The women in Zane Grey, Louis L'Amour, etc. stories were often learning to live
a western life and toughen up. The men they were attracted to were as
tough as the land.
From this came more grown up fare by authors
like Frank Yerby and Ernest Hemingway (yes, he did write stories with
romance even though it usually didn't end well). The romances I read
during that period had history as more important than the romantic
parts, and the endings might or might not have been happy.
It
wasn't until I was married and I think had my first baby that I actually
read my first romance novels of the bodice ripper sort, which had only
recently come into popularity with authors like Rosemary Rogers, and I
might add were considered wicked back then. For me, those books were
quite enlightening, and I went for enlightenment in a big way for a while.
Then
I realized I didn't think it was healthy when any rape was romanticized or glorified
which means even by the hero. I still read romances but less
frequently and a bit more carefully chosen; until, boom, I lost interest
in all of them.
More on this next week as to a defense of the genre.
No comments:
Post a Comment